Friday, August 21, 2015

Reasoning Questions 2015

Reasoning Questions 2015

Directions (1-6) : Study the following information and answer the questions.
Seven friends, namely Lokesh, Mannu, Namo, Ojas, Prashant, Qasim and Ritesh like different animated movies, namely Roadside Romeo, Ice Age, Frozen, Despicable Me, Lion King, Shrek and Cars, but not necessarily in the same order. Each friend also has a presentation on topics of different subjects, namely Civics, History, English, Geography, Chemistry, Physics and Biology but not necessarily in the same order. Qasim has a presentation on Civics and likes neither Frozen nor Despicable Me. The one who likes Roadside Romeo has a presentation on History. Lokesh likes Ice Age and has a presentation neither on Geography nor on Chemistry. The one who likes Cars has a presentation on Biology. Mannu has a presentation on Physics and does not like Despicable Me. The one who likes Despicable Me does not have a presentation on Chemistry. Ojas likes Lion King. Ritesh does not have a presentation on History and does not like Despicable Me. Prashant does not like Despicable Me.

1. On which of the following subjects does P have a presentation?
1) Chemistry
2) English
3) Biology
4) Other than those given as options
5) Geography 

2. Four of the following five form a group Me as per the given arrangement. Which of the following does not belong to that group Me?
1) Ritesh – Cars
2) Qasim – Shrek
3) Namo – Despicable Me
4) Mannu – Frozen
5) Prashant – Ice Age

3. Which of the following combinations is definitely correct?
1) Namo – chemistry
2) Ritesh – History
3) Lokesh – English
4) All the given combinations are definitely correct
5) Prashant – Geography

4. Which of the following combinations of movie and subject is definitely correct with respect to N?
1) Despicable Me – Chemistry
2) Other than those given as options.
3) Shrek – Geography
4) Despicable Me – Geography
5) Roadside Romeo – History

5. Four of the following five form a group Me as per the given arrangement. Which of the following does not belong to that group Me?
1) Biology – Cars
2) Chemistry - Lion King
3) Civics – Shrek
4) English – Frozen
5) Geography – Despicable Me

6. Which of the following given option is not correct?
1) Shrek-Q
2) Other than those given as options.
3) Roadside Romeo-History
4) Lion king – Chemistry
5) Cars –Geography

Directions (7-10) : Each of the questions below consists of a question and two statements numbered I and II given below it. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and give answer:
1) If the data in statement I alone are sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement II alone are not sufficient to answer the question.
2) If the data in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question. While the data in statement I alone are not sufficient to answer the question.
3) If the data either in statement I alone or statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question.
4) If the data in statement I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.
5) If the data in both statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question

7. How many sons does 'R' have ?
I) P and U are the brother of T. S is the sister of G and U.
II) S and T are the daughters of R.

8. Who is the tallest among six friends - Piyush, Teena, Nitin, Dhruv, Yusuf and Rajan ?
I) Piyush is taller than Dhruv and Nitin but not as tall as Teena.
II) Rajan is taller than Yusuf but not as Teena.

9. What does 'ri' means in the code language ?
I) 'ru pa ri da' means ' that is great day', 'zo ye ro ri' means ' some body is missing'.
II) 'tu ti nic ri' means ' is this your pen' and 'mo di chi pi' means 'he always likes swimming'.

10. J, N, T, S and V are sitting around a circular table facing centre of the table, who is sitting immediate left of S ?
I) Only N is sitting between T and V. S is sitting between T and J.
II) Neither V nor T can sit on the left of S.

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Banking Pathway 2015 : English (Mix Quiz)

Banking Pathway 2015 : English (Mix Quiz)
Dear Readers,
                     Today we are providing you quiz on English which is one of the most important sections of banking exams, in which you can score maximum with ease if you are practising on very regular basis, It is crucial for all the upcoming banking exams, IBPS/SBI/RRB etc.

Directions (Q. 1- 5): Rearrange the following sentences (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F) in the proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph and then answer the questions given below it.
(A) Strict obedience to these rules is called discipline. 
(B) In the same way, a society where rules are not followed cannot survive for long.
(C) Only then a society can be run in an orderly fashions.
(D) A society can exist properly only when men living in it agree upon certain rules of conduct.
(E) For example, if the people on the road do not obey traffic rules there will be complete disorder and confusion.
(F) Students must obey their teachers, children their parents, citizens the laws and so on and so forth.

1. Which of the following is the FIFTH sentence ? 
(1) A  
(2) B 
(3) C
(4) E
(5) F

2. Which of the following is the SIXTH (LAST) sentence ?
(1) A
(2) B
(3) C
(4) D
(5) E

3. Which of the following is the SECOND sentences ?
(1) A
(2) B
(3) C
(4) D
(5) E

4. Which of the following is the FIRST sentence ?
(1) A
(2) B
(3) C
(4) D
(5) E

5. Which of the following is the THIRD sentence ?
(1) A
(2) B
(3) C
(4) E

(5) F

Directions (6- 10): Which of the phrase (1), (2), (3), (4) given below each sentences should replace the phrase printed in bold to make the sentence grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark (5) is ‘No correction required’ as the answer.

6. Our country is one of the most densely populated in the world and need increased food production.
(1) needy of increasing
(2) needed an increase
(3) need increasingly the
(4) needs to increase
(5) No correction required

7. This is an organisation which helps the poor by providing loans at mostly less reates of interest.
(1) at much smaller  
(2) at very low
(3) with such lower  
(4) for so little
(5) No correction required

8. I cannot say if I definitely get into the college of my choice but my teachers are confident that I will.
(1) that I shall definitely
(2) whether I was definitely
(3) why I was definitely was to
(4) Unless I definitely was to
(5) No correction required

9. Since this is a crucial project you should choose those who are experienced for it.
(1) will be experiencing
(2) are experienced
(3) have experience of
(4) experience from
(5) No correction required

10. Learnt that he wanted to be posted in the city, I requested the manager to transfer him.
(1) Once I learn
(2) I have learnt since
(3) On learning that
(4) While learning because
(5) No correction required

Directions (Q. 11-15) In each of the following sentences there are two blank spaces. Below each sentence there are five pairs of words denoted by numbers (1), (2), (3)), ,(4) and (5). Find out which pair of words can be filled up in the blanks in the sentence in the same sequence to make the sentence grammatically correct and meaningfully complete.

11. There is no __________ the fact that a man of knowledge _________ great power.
(1) justifying, acknowledges
(2) clarifying, exhibits
(3) advocating, projects
(4) denying, wields
(5) proclaiming, develops

12. The _________ of opinion which emerged at a recently concluded seminar was that the problem of dowry cannot be ___________ unless the law against it is made more stringent.
(1) divergence, managed
(2) sympathy, projected
(3) consensus, tackled
(4) similarity, curbed
(5) convergence, appreciated

13. Leisure must be spent carefully and __________ Only, otherwise the devil will take the ________ of you.
(1) positively, care
(2) constructively, better
(3) pro-actively, though
(4) objectively, energy
(5) purposefully, measure

14. Nothing is impossible is the world of politics. States which were _________ foes and had their deadly missiles pointed at each other find themselves ________ in military alliances.
(1) implacable, partners
(2) intense, joining
(3) deadly, approaching
(4) known, soliciting
(5) enviable, grouping

15. ________ of whether leaders are born or made, it is _________ clear that leaders are not like other people.
(1) Pursuant, manifestly
(2) Sequel, amply
(3) Regardless, unequivocally
(4) Instead, purely
(5) In spite, normally

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Holiness to Pentecost 2015

Holiness to Pentecost 2015
Holiness to Pentecost 2015

"From Holiness to Pentecost"

In the postscript of his book entitled, A Survey of 20th-Century Revival Movements in North America, Richard M. Riss makes the following comments:

A resurgence of Evangelical Christianity has been coming about in America since the late 1940s...If the current resurgence continues, it will provide a milieu conducive to the incidence of an awakening of far greater statistical significance and considerably more extensive societal impact than the earlier revivals of this century...

Should God raise up sufficient intercessors for revival, there is a real possibility that a momentous 'Third Great Awakening,' not only in North America but throughout all Christendom, will explode on the modern scene.

Many are alluding to a spiritual awakening in Christendom. I, for one, agree with Mr. Riss and believe that ministers who are calling for a spiritual awakening, especially in America, are right on with their prophetic insight. 

I believe that the coming spiritual awakening in America alone will surpass the impact of the American first and second Great Awakening(s) of the 18th, 19th, and 20th century revivals. If God can intervene in the affairs of man as He has done throughout recorded history, then He will have no problem bringing about the greatest revival in the history of man. I believe this. 

In continuing my series entitled, "An Awakening is Coming," I'd like to conclude the series by documenting some of the important features of the American Holiness movement that began in the middle 19th century, up to the time when it separated from the Pentecostal movement.

One of the important features about the American Holiness movement was the foundation it served for the revivals of the 20th century. It was John Wesley's teaching on "entire sanctification" that started the American Holiness movement. In simple, Wesley's doctrine spoke of a divine work of the Holy Spirit in the life of the believer, subsequent to salvation. From this teaching came many seekers searching for a greater depth to their salvation experience. Because they came seeking, the Lord blessed them with much more. 

It was during this time that ministries of Divine Healing came into existence. Also at this time Phoebe Palmer, the wife of a prominent physician in New York and a leading teacher in the Holiness movement, labeled the doctrine of 'entire sanctification' as the 'Baptism of the Holy Ghost.' It seems the Holiness movement was okay with the new Holy Spirit moniker as well as embracing other spin-off movements, which included healing ministries and Pentecostal "experiences," but when the issue of "tongues" was recognized by Pentecostals as the initial evidence of being Baptized in the Holy Ghost, the Holiness movement went its own way. 

The American Holiness movement that started in the middle 1800s continues to this day but has fractured into various denominations that cover the globe.

Another important feature of the American Holiness movement was the number of major revivals that branched from its teachings and continued into the 20th century. For example, the Healing revivals of the 1940s were rooted in the Holiness movement. The 1940s healing revivals brought to prominence men like Evangelists Oral Roberts and TL Osborn. Also the decade spawned other movements like the Latter Rain movement and Salvation crusades such as the Billy Graham Crusades. It seems that God linked revival movements together, sustaining the second Great Awakening in America to the end of the 20th century. 

If you remember, the second Great Awakening started in the midnight hour of the 1700s, and continued through the 19th and 20th century with pocket revivals, the Holiness movement, and many other works of grace right up to the end of the 20th century. 

The 1960s and 1970s were the years of the Charismatic Renewal, Jesus Movement, and the Word of Faith Movement. Dr. Bill Hamon said recently, while being interviewed on TBN, that the decade of the 1950s was the decade of the Evangelist. The decade of the 60s was the restoration of the Pastor. The decade of the 70s was the restoration of the Teacher. The decade of the 80s belonged to the Prophets and the 1990s the Apostle. Now that the Five-fold ministry has been restored to its place in the Body, the new millennium will see the ministry of the Saints. The laity will be equipped to do the work of ministry. 

I believe that God is raising up a united front of believers (no names) and bypassing solo ministers who try to go at it alone, for the "Third Great Awakening." This unified front is the laity who will minister in large teams as one, for one purpose. 

I believe they are being positioned now by the Holy Spirit. The baton is being passed to a new generation of people who will walk under great anointing to preach the gospel in the "Third Great Awakening." 

Could the third Great Awakening come in the beginning of the new millennium? It certainly could. The spiritual environment of America is ripe for it. In the past, Awakenings came about as the result of widespread spiritual complacency in the nation. It appeared that God brought these great movements of the past to ready men's hearts for coming national tragedies (Revolutionary war, War of 1812, Civil War, WWI, WWII, and etc.). The 20th century was a century of evil and blood shed. It has been said that it was the century of the devil. There were two world wars, many smaller wars, ethnic cleanings in European nations, death and property destruction by race riots in America, an attempt to exterminate an entire race of people by Hitler, and much, much more evil.

No doubt about it, the century we just left was a nightmare. But one must remember that God was not asleep during the 20th century. He raised up a standard against the satanic onslaught of the 20th century. During this time, God brought forth some of the greatest movements in the history of the church. For example, Evan Roberts in the early 1900s cried out for revival in his country of Wales, and God heard him and sent a worldwide explosion. The revival that turned Wales upside down spread to America and was the forerunner to the Azusa outpouring in Los Angeles, California. From the Azusa outpouring, the revival spilled over America and to the uttermost with the Baptism in the Holy Spirit.

Moreover, another feature of the American Holiness movement, as it jumped into the 20th century, was the unique opposition it faced. What am I referring to? I'm referring to an unusual opposition, which can be identified as a particular Western mindset that had been developing since the Renaissance. For example, from the fourth century onward, Western culture as a whole held to a Christian concept that regarded natural disaster, such as earthquakes or floods, as judgments from God. Such calamities were considered a call to all people everywhere to repent from evil and turn to faith in God. 

Somewhere along the line a predominate number of people began to see natural disasters as accidental or irrelevant to God's purposes. From this mindset came the belief that God was no longer Sovereign. He no longer controlled the events of history. Also, miracles didn't happen any more, and it was foolish to believe such nonsense. When revivals brokeout in the 20th century, they were opposed by this mindset. Because of the prevalence of this attitude, the 20th century would not see the restoration of cities and economies like it did in the First Great Awakening. 

The Bible says that we are to believe Him for who He is-Almighty God. Because He is Almighty, He can do anything but fail. As long as we have a heart to believe that God is still the same miracle working God that He has always been, we will experience the miraculous in our lives; however, if we think God has lost control and is weaker than He was during Pentecost, we will miss many supernatural events that are soon coming. 

There are two secular movements-one of the 18th and one of the 19th century that stripped God of His Sovereignty. In his book that he co-authored with Peter Bocchino, Unshakable 
Foundations: Contemporary Answers to Crucial Questions about the Christian Faith, Norman Geisler talks about the secularization at work during the 19th century. 

One powerful force that opposed Christianity and is still affecting lives today was a philosophy propounded by a German atheist, Friedrich Nietzche. He's the intellectual that coined the phrase, "God is dead and we have killed him." In simple, Nietzche asserted that the myth of God's existence, which was once widely believed, died, and that the myth of objective values died with him. 

He believed that there was no meaning to life, except the meaning man gave to it. Hitler was influenced by this philosophy. Another secular force at work during this time came about in the middle of the 19th century. In 1859 Charles Darwin published his book on macroevolution, On the Origin of Species. People were ripe for the godless theories it stated. They readily embraced Darwin's teaching and man was lowered to the level of animals. 

One final feature of the Holiness movement, was its split from the Pentecostals because of their belief that "tongues" was the initial evidence of being baptized in the Holy Spirit. When the Azusa outpouring began, people came from around the world to receive the gift of "tongues," and then carry the gift back to their part of the world.

Typical of what happens when great moves of God break out, the explosion happens first, and then men try to explain the explosion by doctrines later. When one of Charles Parham's Bible students, Agnes Ozman, received the Baptism of the Holy Ghost and began speaking in tongues, Parham made an assignment for his students. He wanted them to study the Bible, and list every occurrence of Holy Spirit Baptisms in the New Testament. They were then instructed to list the one thing that manifested with it. 

Overwhelmingly the students reported "tongues" to be the initial evidence of the Holy Spirit Baptism. Later when the Azusa outpouring was going strong in Los Angeles, California, the Reverend William Seymour, a Holiness preacher who led the early Azusa outpouring, came into conflict over the doctrine of sanctification with William Durham. Durham said that sanctification was a progressive work of holiness being worked out in the believer by the Holy Spirit. He said that the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with the evidence of speaking in tongues was not the work of sanctification but an experience subsequent to salvation. 

Sanctification was a work of the Holy Spirit in the life of the believer, which continued the entire lifetime of the believer. Seymour, being a true Holiness preacher who had received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with tongues, disagreed. He said that salvation was first, then entire sanctification, and then the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with tongues, last. They never resolved the issue and eventually went separate ways.

The issue has never been settled. The Holiness churches that teach "entire sanctification" still believe that sanctification is a Divine work of the Spirit to seal the Salvation experience with power. They are opposed to "tongues" being the sole or initial evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit. 

And, then again, there is a group of sincere Christians that believe the Reformed doctrine of Martin Luther. They believe sanctification is a progressive work of the Spirit, continuing throughout the lifetime of the saint. They do not teach "entire sanctification" nor the Pentecostal experience of being baptized in the Holy Spirit and speaking in tongues. 

However, some groups in the Reformed tradition believe there is first Salvation, then the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with the evidence of speaking in tongues, and then progressively sanctification of a believer is worked out a believer "walks in the spirit and not the flesh." Nevertheless, no matter how you pronounce potato, it's still a potato. If one is hungry for God and seeks a deeper walk, one will find a more intimate, a more satisfying experience of Him if they keep searching for Him.

So, I've given you some of the important features of the Holiness movement from its inception in the middle 19th century to its split from the Pentecostal movement of the 20th century. One important point to remember from this document is God's desire to use simple prayers and insignificant people who simply have a burning and passion for God, to reach their community and nations. The Bible warns us against sneering at small beginnings. No matter how big the move, it started with a seed. Once again, I believe that God is stirring up revival winds. The wind of His Spirit is getting ready to fan the flames, until revival is burning out of control. Are you ready? 

Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015
Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015

"From Holiness to Pentecost"

In the postscript of his book entitled, A Survey of 20th-Century Revival Movements in North America, Richard M. Riss makes the following comments:

A resurgence of Evangelical Christianity has been coming about in America since the late 1940s...If the current resurgence continues, it will provide a milieu conducive to the incidence of an awakening of far greater statistical significance and considerably more extensive societal impact than the earlier revivals of this century...

Should God raise up sufficient intercessors for revival, there is a real possibility that a momentous 'Third Great Awakening,' not only in North America but throughout all Christendom, will explode on the modern scene.

Many are alluding to a spiritual awakening in Christendom. I, for one, agree with Mr. Riss and believe that ministers who are calling for a spiritual awakening, especially in America, are right on with their prophetic insight. 

I believe that the coming spiritual awakening in America alone will surpass the impact of the American first and second Great Awakening(s) of the 18th, 19th, and 20th century revivals. If God can intervene in the affairs of man as He has done throughout recorded history, then He will have no problem bringing about the greatest revival in the history of man. I believe this. 

In continuing my series entitled, "An Awakening is Coming," I'd like to conclude the series by documenting some of the important features of the American Holiness movement that began in the middle 19th century, up to the time when it separated from the Pentecostal movement.

One of the important features about the American Holiness movement was the foundation it served for the revivals of the 20th century. It was John Wesley's teaching on "entire sanctification" that started the American Holiness movement. In simple, Wesley's doctrine spoke of a divine work of the Holy Spirit in the life of the believer, subsequent to salvation. From this teaching came many seekers searching for a greater depth to their salvation experience. Because they came seeking, the Lord blessed them with much more. 

It was during this time that ministries of Divine Healing came into existence. Also at this time Phoebe Palmer, the wife of a prominent physician in New York and a leading teacher in the Holiness movement, labeled the doctrine of 'entire sanctification' as the 'Baptism of the Holy Ghost.' It seems the Holiness movement was okay with the new Holy Spirit moniker as well as embracing other spin-off movements, which included healing ministries and Pentecostal "experiences," but when the issue of "tongues" was recognized by Pentecostals as the initial evidence of being Baptized in the Holy Ghost, the Holiness movement went its own way. 

The American Holiness movement that started in the middle 1800s continues to this day but has fractured into various denominations that cover the globe.

Another important feature of the American Holiness movement was the number of major revivals that branched from its teachings and continued into the 20th century. For example, the Healing revivals of the 1940s were rooted in the Holiness movement. The 1940s healing revivals brought to prominence men like Evangelists Oral Roberts and TL Osborn. Also the decade spawned other movements like the Latter Rain movement and Salvation crusades such as the Billy Graham Crusades. It seems that God linked revival movements together, sustaining the second Great Awakening in America to the end of the 20th century. 

If you remember, the second Great Awakening started in the midnight hour of the 1700s, and continued through the 19th and 20th century with pocket revivals, the Holiness movement, and many other works of grace right up to the end of the 20th century. 

The 1960s and 1970s were the years of the Charismatic Renewal, Jesus Movement, and the Word of Faith Movement. Dr. Bill Hamon said recently, while being interviewed on TBN, that the decade of the 1950s was the decade of the Evangelist. The decade of the 60s was the restoration of the Pastor. The decade of the 70s was the restoration of the Teacher. The decade of the 80s belonged to the Prophets and the 1990s the Apostle. Now that the Five-fold ministry has been restored to its place in the Body, the new millennium will see the ministry of the Saints. The laity will be equipped to do the work of ministry. 

I believe that God is raising up a united front of believers (no names) and bypassing solo ministers who try to go at it alone, for the "Third Great Awakening." This unified front is the laity who will minister in large teams as one, for one purpose. 

I believe they are being positioned now by the Holy Spirit. The baton is being passed to a new generation of people who will walk under great anointing to preach the gospel in the "Third Great Awakening." 

Could the third Great Awakening come in the beginning of the new millennium? It certainly could. The spiritual environment of America is ripe for it. In the past, Awakenings came about as the result of widespread spiritual complacency in the nation. It appeared that God brought these great movements of the past to ready men's hearts for coming national tragedies (Revolutionary war, War of 1812, Civil War, WWI, WWII, and etc.). The 20th century was a century of evil and blood shed. It has been said that it was the century of the devil. There were two world wars, many smaller wars, ethnic cleanings in European nations, death and property destruction by race riots in America, an attempt to exterminate an entire race of people by Hitler, and much, much more evil.

No doubt about it, the century we just left was a nightmare. But one must remember that God was not asleep during the 20th century. He raised up a standard against the satanic onslaught of the 20th century. During this time, God brought forth some of the greatest movements in the history of the church. For example, Evan Roberts in the early 1900s cried out for revival in his country of Wales, and God heard him and sent a worldwide explosion. The revival that turned Wales upside down spread to America and was the forerunner to the Azusa outpouring in Los Angeles, California. From the Azusa outpouring, the revival spilled over America and to the uttermost with the Baptism in the Holy Spirit.

Moreover, another feature of the American Holiness movement, as it jumped into the 20th century, was the unique opposition it faced. What am I referring to? I'm referring to an unusual opposition, which can be identified as a particular Western mindset that had been developing since the Renaissance. For example, from the fourth century onward, Western culture as a whole held to a Christian concept that regarded natural disaster, such as earthquakes or floods, as judgments from God. Such calamities were considered a call to all people everywhere to repent from evil and turn to faith in God. 

Somewhere along the line a predominate number of people began to see natural disasters as accidental or irrelevant to God's purposes. From this mindset came the belief that God was no longer Sovereign. He no longer controlled the events of history. Also, miracles didn't happen any more, and it was foolish to believe such nonsense. When revivals brokeout in the 20th century, they were opposed by this mindset. Because of the prevalence of this attitude, the 20th century would not see the restoration of cities and economies like it did in the First Great Awakening. 

The Bible says that we are to believe Him for who He is-Almighty God. Because He is Almighty, He can do anything but fail. As long as we have a heart to believe that God is still the same miracle working God that He has always been, we will experience the miraculous in our lives; however, if we think God has lost control and is weaker than He was during Pentecost, we will miss many supernatural events that are soon coming. 

There are two secular movements-one of the 18th and one of the 19th century that stripped God of His Sovereignty. In his book that he co-authored with Peter Bocchino, Unshakable 
Foundations: Contemporary Answers to Crucial Questions about the Christian Faith, Norman Geisler talks about the secularization at work during the 19th century. 

One powerful force that opposed Christianity and is still affecting lives today was a philosophy propounded by a German atheist, Friedrich Nietzche. He's the intellectual that coined the phrase, "God is dead and we have killed him." In simple, Nietzche asserted that the myth of God's existence, which was once widely believed, died, and that the myth of objective values died with him. 

He believed that there was no meaning to life, except the meaning man gave to it. Hitler was influenced by this philosophy. Another secular force at work during this time came about in the middle of the 19th century. In 1859 Charles Darwin published his book on macroevolution, On the Origin of Species. People were ripe for the godless theories it stated. They readily embraced Darwin's teaching and man was lowered to the level of animals. 

One final feature of the Holiness movement, was its split from the Pentecostals because of their belief that "tongues" was the initial evidence of being baptized in the Holy Spirit. When the Azusa outpouring began, people came from around the world to receive the gift of "tongues," and then carry the gift back to their part of the world.

Typical of what happens when great moves of God break out, the explosion happens first, and then men try to explain the explosion by doctrines later. When one of Charles Parham's Bible students, Agnes Ozman, received the Baptism of the Holy Ghost and began speaking in tongues, Parham made an assignment for his students. He wanted them to study the Bible, and list every occurrence of Holy Spirit Baptisms in the New Testament. They were then instructed to list the one thing that manifested with it. 

Overwhelmingly the students reported "tongues" to be the initial evidence of the Holy Spirit Baptism. Later when the Azusa outpouring was going strong in Los Angeles, California, the Reverend William Seymour, a Holiness preacher who led the early Azusa outpouring, came into conflict over the doctrine of sanctification with William Durham. Durham said that sanctification was a progressive work of holiness being worked out in the believer by the Holy Spirit. He said that the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with the evidence of speaking in tongues was not the work of sanctification but an experience subsequent to salvation. 

Sanctification was a work of the Holy Spirit in the life of the believer, which continued the entire lifetime of the believer. Seymour, being a true Holiness preacher who had received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with tongues, disagreed. He said that salvation was first, then entire sanctification, and then the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with tongues, last. They never resolved the issue and eventually went separate ways.

The issue has never been settled. The Holiness churches that teach "entire sanctification" still believe that sanctification is a Divine work of the Spirit to seal the Salvation experience with power. They are opposed to "tongues" being the sole or initial evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit. 

And, then again, there is a group of sincere Christians that believe the Reformed doctrine of Martin Luther. They believe sanctification is a progressive work of the Spirit, continuing throughout the lifetime of the saint. They do not teach "entire sanctification" nor the Pentecostal experience of being baptized in the Holy Spirit and speaking in tongues. 

However, some groups in the Reformed tradition believe there is first Salvation, then the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with the evidence of speaking in tongues, and then progressively sanctification of a believer is worked out a believer "walks in the spirit and not the flesh." Nevertheless, no matter how you pronounce potato, it's still a potato. If one is hungry for God and seeks a deeper walk, one will find a more intimate, a more satisfying experience of Him if they keep searching for Him.

So, I've given you some of the important features of the Holiness movement from its inception in the middle 19th century to its split from the Pentecostal movement of the 20th century. One important point to remember from this document is God's desire to use simple prayers and insignificant people who simply have a burning and passion for God, to reach their community and nations. The Bible warns us against sneering at small beginnings. No matter how big the move, it started with a seed. Once again, I believe that God is stirring up revival winds. The wind of His Spirit is getting ready to fan the flames, until revival is burning out of control. Are you ready? 

Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015
Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015 || Holiness to Pentecost 2015


http://pentecost2015fest.blogspot.in/

Friday, April 3, 2015

Efficient PL/SQL Coding

Efficient PL/SQL Coding
A trigger that fires several times at different triggering events, ability to force triggers of the same type to follow a sequence, and the new CONTINUE statement are some of the new gems that make PL/SQL programming easier.

See Series TOC

Since its inception, PL/SQL has been the language of choice for programming in Oracle Database. Over a period of time, we have seen the language evolve into a comprehensive development platform by virtue of more and more functionality that requires less coding. Oracle Database 11g makes PL/SQL coding yet more efficient for programmers. In this installment, you will see some examples that offer an introductory glimpse into this new functionality.

Compound Triggers
Consider a hotel database: bookings for the hotel rooms are recorded in the table named BOOKINGS. You also want to record the changes to this table to a tracking table—sort of like auditing, but with a twist: You want to make it transactional. Triggers are perfect for that.

You come up with a small after-update row trigger that records the old and new values along with who changed it into a table BOOKINGS_HIST. So far, so good.

But there is a little issue here. The after-update row trigger fires for every row, and some bookings are changed in bulk, updating hundreds of rows in one transaction. Separate after-update-row triggers fire for each of these rows and each execution inserts a record into the bookings_hist table, so performance is not optimal.

A better approach may be to batch these inserts and insert them in bulk to the bookings_hist table as well. You can accomplish that using a complex series of triggers. The trick is to put the values to be placed in the bookings_hist table in a collection in the row trigger and then load the data from the collection to the bookings_hist table in the after-update-statement trigger, which fires only once. As the actual insert happens only once, the process is faster than inserting on each row.

But these are two different triggers in separate pieces of code. The only way to pass a collection variable from one trigger to the other is to create a package with a collection variable such as VARRAY or PL/SQL TABLE in the package specification, populate it on the after-update row trigger, and read in the after-statement trigger—no easy task. Instead, wouldn't it be simpler if you could place all the triggers in one piece of code?

In Oracle Database 11g you can, using compound triggers. A compound trigger is actually four different triggers defined as one. For instance, an UPDATE compound trigger has a before statement, before row, after statement, and after row all rolled into one compound trigger. This a single piece of code, so you can pass variables just like any other monolithic PL/SQL code.

Let's consider an example. The line numbers are added to aid explanation.

1  create or replace trigger tr_bookings_track
     2  for update of booking_dt
     3  on bookings
     4  compound trigger
     5      type ty_bookings_hist is table of bookings_hist%rowtype
     6          index by pls_integer;
     7      coll_bookings_hist          ty_bookings_hist;
     8      ctr                         pls_integer := 0;
     9  before statement is
    10  begin
    11      dbms_output.put_line('In before statement');
    12  end before statement;
    13  before each row is
    14  begin
    15      dbms_output.put_line('In before each row');
    16  end before each row;
    17  after each row is
    18  begin
    19      ctr := ctr + 1;
    20      dbms_output.put_line('In after each row. booking_id='||:new.booking_id);
    21      coll_bookings_hist(ctr).booking_id := :new.booking_id;
    22      coll_bookings_hist(ctr).mod_dt := sysdate;
    23      coll_bookings_hist(ctr).mod_user := user;
    24      coll_bookings_hist(ctr).old_booking_dt := :old.booking_dt;
    25      coll_bookings_hist(ctr).new_booking_dt := :new.booking_dt;
    26  end after each row;
    27  after statement is
    28  begin
    29      dbms_output.put_line('In after statement');
    30      forall counter in 1..coll_bookings_hist.count()
    31          insert into bookings_hist
    32          values coll_bookings_hist(counter);
    33  end after statement;
    34  end tr_bookings_track;

To better understand the workings of the trigger, let's do a sample update, which updates four rows.